Book Review: Jerramy Fine's "Someday My Prince Will Come"

Read my review of Someday My Prince Will Come by Jerramy Fine at The Royal Reader!

Read more!

Book Review: Sarah Bradford's "Diana"

Read my review of Diana by Sarah Bradford at The Royal Reader!

Read more!

Photo Essay: "Charles and Camilla Get the Giggles"

I saw this series of pictures, and I just couldn't resist a good photo essay. How often do you get to see the Windsors having this much fun on an official engagement? The Prince of Wales and the Duchess of Cornwall are attending the Mey Highland Games in Caithness, Scotland. Prince Charles is acting as the honorary Chieftain of the games, a role that his late grandmother, the Queen Mum, fulfilled for years.

And now ... on to the photo essay! Pictures are all from Getty Images (as the watermark shows), taken by Jeff J. Mitchell on August 9, 2008.

Camilla has a hair-raising moment at the games.

Gusts of wind were a feature of the day at the games, and I'd wager that a windy accident (with a wayward kilt, perhaps?) provoked the following reactions from the Duchess, her husband, and the rest of the crowd near her...


Embarrassment...

Tears of laughter...

Giggling...

Laughing harder now...

Guffaws...

And, finally, a bright red face for the heir to the throne.

Looks like the Highland Games were a blast! If all royal engagements were this much fun, surely every family member would have a full slate of activities. ;)

Read more!

Eight's a lucky birthday number for Princess Beatrice

Princess Beatrice backstage at a fashion show, preparing to take to the catwalk

Best wishes for a very happy twentieth birthday for Princess Beatrice of York!

Today's a big day all over the globe: the 2008 Summer Olympics are beginning in Beijing. According to those who believe in numerology, today is also a very lucky day for the world, because August 8, 2008 translates to 8/8/8. China chose the day purposely for the opening ceremonies because of its good energy, even starting the festivities at 8:08 PM.

(The Daily Mail, tabloid that it is, has a really interesting piece up today about all of the numerological and astrological ideas surrounding today's date: "Is today, 8/08/08, the luckiest day of the year?")

So, surely for Princess Beatrice, who was born at 8:18 on 8/8/88, today will be a happy and lucky day to turn twenty.

It won't be a big party; the royal granddaughter has already had her coming-of-age birthday bash, choosing to celebrate her eighteenth birthday two years ago (those eights again!) with a costume ball instead of waiting for the more traditional twenty-first birthday party.

The Duke of York, Sarah, Duchess of York, and Princess Eugenie of York celebrate Princess Beatrice's eighteenth birthday in 2006

The York girls were always going to be unconventional; their jovial father and controversial, mischievous mother were undoubtedly going to be fun but non-traditional role models for their two girls. They have managed to keep up a strong family bond even after divorcing more than ten years ago, co-parenting in an apparently cooperative and friendly environment and even living at times under the same roof. In an interview with Tatler (an excerpt can be found on the Telegraph site: "Princess Eugenie: Little Princess Sunshine") to mark her own eighteenth birthday, Princess Beatrice's sister, Princess Eugenie, called the Yorks "the best divorced couple I know ... they just always went out of their way to make us feel loved and secure."


The York princesses seem remarkably unscathed by the incredible press attention the family received when their parents' marriage was revealed to be crumbling in the early nineties. Princess Beatrice has just finished a gap year and will begin fashion studies soon at London's Goldsmiths College. She dates an American, Dave Clark, who works for Richard Branson's Virgin Galactic company. Her sister has been the one to attract scandal of late, romping about naked at Marlborough College to celebrate the end of exams.

Princess Beatrice listens intently to her father, The Duke of York, at a speaking engagement in January

Even though they're often photographed out at popular London nightspots, both young princesses are also demonstrating a commitment to their royal roles. It was recently revealed by the Telegraph ("Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie to take on more royal charity work") that the girls will begin a more intensive slate of royal engagements with various charities in coming years as a way to "repay" the government for the cost of their security detail.

And now, to mark Beatrice's twentieth birthday, perhaps the lucky day of eights is bringing the family even closer together. For the first time since compromising photographs of the princesses' mother were published during the royal family's summer holiday at Balmoral, Sarah, Duchess of York, has been invited back to the family's beloved Scottish estate.

The Telegraph ("Sarah Ferguson, the Duchess of York, enjoys first Royal holiday in 16 years") reports that Sarah "will spend the weekend at the Royal retreat celebrating Beatrice's birthday," and that she arrived at Balmoral with her ex-husband and her daughters yesterday. An unnamed royal source describes the invitation as "an astonishing breakthrough."

It is yet another in a series of gestures on the part of the Queen, arguably beginning with granting permission for The Prince of Wales to marry his longtime love, Camilla Parker Bowles, that show the monarch's increasing willingness to put aside convention and tradition in order to make her family happier and more united. (Prince Philip, according to the Telegraph, is apparently less willing to make similar concessions -- he will not be at Balmoral for the birthday weekend.)

Beatrice and her royal family: (clockwise from center top): Cousin Harry, Bea, Grandfather, Granny, and Aunt Camilla at Peter Phillips's May wedding

It must be incredibly difficult for Queen Elizabeth to forgive someone like Sarah Ferguson, who caused her son a great deal of pain with her infidelities, but, as with any fractured and complicated modern family, it is a necessary act. Though she is often portrayed as distant and cool when it comes to family affection, gestures like allowing Sarah to come to Balmoral for Beatrice's birthday show that she loves her grandchildren more than probably anyone can know.

So, it's to be a happy, lucky birthday for Princess Bea. As for the celebrations themselves, the Duchess of York herself revealed yesterday, "We're having a very private party. I can't tell you what her present is – that would spoil the surprise."

But surely the young princess already has one of the best birthday presents of all: a day surrounded by the family who loves her -- even if they're less than traditional.


Read more!

Can a royal marriage be an open marriage?

Prince and Princess Michael of Kent

This week, the Daily Mail’s Christopher Wilson reported ("Payback time for Princess Pushy as Prince Michael cavorts with a young blonde") on more possible rifts in the marriage of Prince and Princess Michael of Kent – a union which has endured major scrutiny over the years, including several accusations that Marie Christine has been unfaithful to her royal husband. But Wilson’s article purportedly revealed that the princess has not been the only one in the marriage who has sought extramarital companionship. Wilson suggests that Prince Michael may have developed romantic relationships with several women, most recently a Danish socialite, Marianne Krex, whom he escorted to a Royal Ballet performance at the Coliseum in London in June.

Wilson’s fellow Mail reporters Peter Allen and Polly Dunbar first wrote on Prince Michael’s outing with Krex on June 26 ("Prince Michael and a camera-shy blonde"). In their article, Allen and Dunbar hint at the possibility that Krex might be more than just a friend of the Queen’s cousin. One of their unnamed sources remarks, “[Marianne]’s a single woman so is perfectly entitled to hang around with anyone she chooses.” Fellow Stephen Raby employee Emma Pigott, when asked if Krex had disclosed her friendship with the prince to any confidants, explains, “She’s quite private so I doubt she would have told anyone about it.”

According to the Mail, Krex is not the first female companion to accompany Prince Michael to events in place of his wife. Both Wilson’s article and Allen and Dunbar’s piece mention Leonie Freida, with whom Prince Michael attended a Chinese New Year costume party in 2006. Allen and Dunbar also cite as a possible extramarital partner former Royal Ballet principal Bryony Brind, whom the prince reportedly courted in 1994. Wilson adds that, with the upcoming memoirs of one of the prince’s rumored lovers, American artist Lucy Weber, more details of the prince’s adulterous affairs may come to light: “As yet untitled, her book should perhaps be called My Life With Casanova since, for eight years, Ms Weber was the prince's squeeze.” Wilson also includes sordid alleged details about the prince’s trysts, including quotes from a source who claims that he frequently takes women to a curtained-off room above Julie’s, a Notting Hill restaurant.

Wilson’s article – the only one of the two that clearly insinuates that Prince Michael and Krex are conducting a romance, rather than attending social functions as friends – portrays the Prince’s alleged extramarital relationships as a sort of delicious comeuppance for Princess Michael, whose media nickname “Princess Pushy” is used by all three Mail writers. Marie Christine has long been rumored to have romanced a string of lovers since her marriage to Prince Michael, including American Senator John Warner, Texan oilman Ward Hunt, and young Russian Mikhail Kravchenko. Wilson suggests that maybe Prince Michael’s affairs amount to “payback time” for his philandering wife.

Danish socialite Marianne Krex and Prince Michael of Kent

To me, the larger question that is raised by these two Mail articles is, simply: why? Royal gossip is, of course, the bread and butter of British tabloid magazines, but two expose pieces on a royal marriage that many have long assumed is open seem redundant and, frankly, unnecessary. I tend to think that the prince and princess have probably had some sort of mutual understanding about the open nature of their marriage for some time, and the attempts on the part of the Mail to sensationalize that understanding seem designed to exploit the Kent marriage as a way to shock and intrigue readers who subscribe to a more traditional idea of marriage.

Indeed, there are aspects of each article that seem a little problematic. The Wilson article claims that Prince and Princess Michael conduct their affairs to make each other jealous, and that their crumbling union is kept together only because Prince Michael fears a divorce will embarrass his cousin, the Queen. Wilson states, “Friends say that when it comes to the Royal Family, Michael is very loyal to the Queen,” and quotes one of these unnamed friends, who notes, “[Prince Michael] could have kicked [Marie Christine] out long ago … [but] he gave up his place in the line of succession to marry her. It caused a huge stink at the time. He couldn't embarrass the Queen a second time by getting a divorce.”

But, surely, the fact that the Queen has managed to cope with the divorces of royals with much higher profiles – three of her children and her younger sister – would mean that if Prince and Princess Michael really did want to divorce, the Queen would be able to handle it.

It seems more likely to me that Michael and Marie Christine do not want to divorce. They may have been less than discreet about their extramarital relationships (especially the princess, who has been photographed holding hands with at least one of her reported lovers), but the two have not to my knowledge ever feuded publicly about their affairs. Divorces can be painful and public – Marie Christine has already endured one with her first husband, Thomas Troubridge, in 1977 (it was followed by an annulment). Her parents were also divorced. They also have two children, and so they will continue to be a family unit even if they were to legally end their marriage. Dividing royal assets, as we’ve all seen from the York and Wales divorces of the mid-nineties, can also be a royal pain in the backside.

So, if the two wish to see others outside of their marriage, with the consent of both spouses, what’s the problem? Such marriages were the staple of royalty throughout history, and it is only with the fairly recent movement to make royal people more “normal” that keeping lovers has fallen out of fashion – even if Prince Charles wanted to think otherwise during his first marriage. The media has brought royal exploits closer to home for the average citizen, and that average citizen seems to want a moral, upright, and prudent royal family.

Lady Gabriella Windsor and Lord Frederick Windsor

But Prince and Princess Michael are on the fringes of the royal family at best. Their children, Lord Frederick Windsor and Lady Gabriella Windsor, are both private citizens with jobs in the public sector. They are currently 32nd and 33rd in line to the British throne. Prince Michael isn’t in the line of succession at all anymore, having forfeited his place when he married Marie Christine, who is a Roman Catholic (the kids get to stay because they were raised as Anglicans). Their distance from the crown affords them a greater sense of privacy than, say, the Prince of Wales, and because of this, they’ve also got more room in their lives for non-traditional relationship structures.

It all boils down to this: the romantic exploits of a long-married pair of minor royals may be good fodder for tabloids hurting for stories, but as sources of embarrassment for the Queen, they’re surely quite low-level. The only reason these stories are newsworthy at all is that Princess Michael and her husband often seek the public eye, appearing at social events where they will likely be photographed and possible discussed in gossip columns. Even so, they should be free to conduct their marriage however they like – and even if they did decide to divorce, such an action would probably be fairly inconsequential for the monarchy as an institution.

Prince and Princess Michael (right) with The Queen (left) and Charles and Camilla (center)

So, can a royal marriage be an open marriage? The only answer I can come up with isn't really a fair one: it can, so long as the couple in question isn't too close to the throne. Even though Prince Charles and Diana, Princess of Wales both had affairs, an open marriage never would have worked for them, partly because Diana was unsatisfied with sharing her husband's love with Camilla Parker Bowles, and partly because their popularity as a loving couple was so crucial to the monarchy's standing with the people. The "establishment" is lucky that it survived the '90s-era War of the Waleses.

So, while maybe one day the Queen's other grandchildren might be able to have a marriage like Prince and Princess Michael of Kent, Prince William likely would not be able to -- the people, if they discovered it, surely wouldn't stand it.
Read more!